Home | Top Stories | Opposition to Maute hearings snowballs
ARMY PATROL. An Army truck full of soldiers patrol the streets of Marawi city. They are still fighting in most streets in the predominantly Muslim city nearly a month after the Maute Group members attempted to take hold of the city. (PHOTO BY FROILAN GALLARDO)

Opposition to Maute hearings snowballs

By LITO RULONA
and NITZ ARANCON
Correspondents

THE Misamis Oriental provincial board, Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) here, and a coalition of business groups passed separate resolutions to oppose a Supreme Court order for all Maute Group cases to be heard in the city.

Vice Gov. Jose Mari Pelaez said the provincial board on Wednesday unanimously approved a resolution to express its opposition to the order of the high tribunal.

Pelaez said the legislature also protested the order to detain arrested Maute Group suspects here.

“Misamis Oriental and Cagayan  de Oro [is not the place] for such ‘high-risk’ detainees. Basin unya nga ang ilang mga  relative or ang ilang mga suporters  dunay himo-on nga mga kagubot,” Pelaez.

Organized lawyers in the city earlier passed a similar resolution.

The local IBP resolution, dated June 8, 2017, was signed by its president Eddie Cuaresma and other officers that include lawyers Cancio Nicanor Guibone, Katrina Mordeno, Kennette Tumala, Janeth Nuñez, Dexter Precioso, Teresa Quiñal Blanco, Rex Jose Raagas, Gregorio Miguel Pallugna,  Anna Caroz, Jayfrancis Bago, and former IBP chapter president Rey Raagas.

The IBP said the SC order exposes the city to great security risks, pointing out that members of the Maute Group have “relatives and families” in the city who might  add “outside  pressure.”

It also pointed out that the city lost its Hall of Justice to a fire.

“The  IBP-Misamis Oriental Chapter is of the view that Cagayan de Oro City is not prepared  to accommodate the Maute case and instead, it should be heard  in neutral  areas and isolated from  outside pressure or distraction  like  the court in Cebu  City,  or in Metro  Manila,” reads part of the IBP resolution.

A coalition of business groups in the city and Misamis Oriental also went public with its opposition to the SC order. A joint resolution was passed on Thursday that was signed by officers of five business organizations in the city and province.

The coalition include that Cagayan de Oro Chamber of Commerce and Industry Foundation Inc. (Oro Chamber), Misamis Oriental Filipino Chinese Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc. (Mofccci), Federation of Filipino-Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc. CDO (CDO-FFCCII), Cagayan de Oro Chamber of Industries (Coci), and the Philippine Chamber of Commerce and Industry (PCCI) in Region 10.

The signatories include Oro Chamber president Robertino Pizarro, Mofcccii president Adelfa Sia, CDO-FFCCII president Willy Limbonhai, Coci president Roberto Quicio and PCCI-10 president Efren Uy.

The coalition said the local business community already suffered at least P200 million or more in lost opportunities and potential investments since the start of the Marawi siege and the declaration of martial law in Mindanao.

The coalition also said the local business community was also hurting as a result of recent travel advisories issued by other countries, cautioning against travel to Mindanao.

They said the situation would be aggravated by more security concerns resulting from the Maute case hearings in the city.

“Given the proximity of Cagayan de Oro from the conflict area… there might be possible retaliation or rescue efforts by the terrorists that may happen if the trial were to happen in Cagayan de Oro,” reads part of the Coalition’s resolution.

A copy of the resolution was submitted to the SC early this week.

Facebooktwitter

About mindanao goldstar daily

mindanao goldstar daily
TREND MAKER. Mindanao Gold Star Daily was established in 1989 to set ablaze a new meaning & flame to the local newspaper business. Throughout the years it continued its focus and interest in the rural areas & pioneered the growth of countryside journalism.

Check Also

Council to look into sports center mess

By LITO RULONA Correspondent / VICE Mayor Raineir Joaquin Uy has tasked the city council ...

One comment

  1. My opposition is basically for the reason that the DOJ and/or the SC has no appropriate court room and place to try the case after the Hall of Justice was razed by fire so many years ago. The other reasons presented by the other oppositors are equally important based on their own perceptions and affiliations. This is also an opportune time for DOJ and/or the SC to revisit the plan to rebuild the Hall of Justice which is badly needed even more by CdeO.

DISCLAIMER: We welcome fiery exchanges but we do not tolerate ad hominem attacks, casting criminal and false aspersion on our reporters and opinion writers. We reserve the right to delete, reproduce or modify comments posted on our website without prior notice.


POSTING RULES: Do not use obscenity. Stick to the topic discussed. Do not veer away from the discussion and be respectful at all times. Do not use CAPITAL LETTERS as this means shouting in the thread.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *