A pseudo-pandemic device

By Jude Josue L. Sabio .

THE currently used RT PCR test purportedly to massively detect the viral infection from the Sars-Cov 2 only leads to an illusion of a pseudo-pandemic, because it is just a “manufacturing technique” not meant to detect a viral infection, which could lead to a massive false test.

Tommy Morisson fell victim to an HIV false test in 1996. A celebrity American heavyweight boxing champ, he tested positive for HIV at the prime of his boxing career. As a result of the test believed then to be true, his boxing career was abruptly ended. But in 2007, he underwent two HIV tests, one of which was for the New York Times. The tests showed he did not have HIV. In 2013, he died at the age of 44. Based on an autopsy, it was found that he had no HIV, which was consistent with the antemortem examination done a few days before he died. After his death, his wife relentlessly sought to clear his name from the stigma of HIV, not to mention the painful effects it spawned, by filing a civil lawsuit against the Nevada sports commission and Quest Diagnostics that made the 1996 HIV test. In the case files, it has come to light that the Quest Diagnostics has admitted that its 1996 HIV test does not detect the HIV viral infection. The celebrated dispute is still raging to date.

Even a hospital itself did not escape the false test. A pseudo-epidemic incident at the Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center in the USA is documented in the New York Times article entitled “Faith in Quick Test Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t” written by Gina Kolata and published 22 January 2007. As narrated in the article, the medical center was caught in what was then believed to be an epidemic of “whooping cough” which is caused by the bacterium Bordetella Pertussis. Its health workers contracted a respiratory sickness exhibiting symptoms of “whooping cough”. Concerned that patients in the hospital might be infected, the hospital conducted a quick PCR test that turned out to be positive for “whooping cough”. An epidemic was believed to have occurred in the hospital. The health workers were given antibiotics and vaccines. This belief turned out to be a false alarm when efforts were made to conduct a definitive test by growing the supposed bacterium in the lab. But they were not able to grow the bacterium, because it did not exist in the first place. It was not a “whooping cough” epidemic, but just a respiratory illness associated with the common cold. The hospital called the incident a “pseudo-pandemic”.

The Morisson false HIV positive test and the Dartmouth pseudo-epidemic illustrate how a purported quick PCR test could lead to a false result and its adverse impact. In the case of Morisson, it destroyed his boxing career at the time of his prime when he was supposed to fight Mike Tyson in the ring. The false PCR test in the Dartmouth hospital resulted in a false belief in an epidemic leading to medical interventions that should have been proper only when there is really an epidemic.

The Morisson case is highly notable, because it is very much celebrated involving, as it does, a celebrity boxing icon, and it has spawned a protracted legal battle that has partially reached the US Federal Supreme Court in 2018 on certain legal aspects. More than that, it stands out, because it happened in the context of the raging debate on whether or not HIV is the cause of Aids.

This HIV medical war has something to do with the RT PCR test that is the current method used in the mass testing of covid-19. The RT PCR test came into popular use in 1990, or before the 1996 HIV test of Tommy Morisson. At that time, the HIV retrovirus was not highly detectable; but with the advent of the PCR invented by Kary Mullis that earned him a Nobel Prize in 1993, test manufacturing companies weaponized the PCR and used it to prove that HIV is the cause of Aids.

Celia Farber was “in the rare position of having known, spent time with, and interviewed the inventor of the method used in the presently available Covid-19 tests, which is called PCR, (Polymerase Chain Reaction.)” As a journalist, she closely followed this epic battle. “One time, in 1994, when I called to talk to him about how PCR was being weaponized to “prove,” almost a decade after it was asserted, that HIV caused AIDS, he actually came to tears”, said Celia Farber referring to Kary Mullis in her article “Was the Covid-19 Test Meant to Detect a Virus” dated 7 April 2020.

In said article, Mr. Farber referred to an email made by Karl Mullis on 7 May 2013 to the widow of Tommy Morisson. The email states: “PCR detects a very small segment of the nucleic acid which is part of a virus itself. The specific fragment detected is determined by the somewhat arbitrary choice of DNA primers used which become the ends of the amplified fragment.“ To this, Ms. Farber remarks: “If things were done right, “infection” would be a far cry from a positive PCR test”.

“PCR is a needle in a haystack technology that can be extremely misleading in “the diagnosis of infectious diseases.” The first conflict between this revolutionary technology and human life happened on the battlefield of AIDS, and Mullis himself came to the front line arguing against PCR as a diagnostic tool”, said Mr. Farber in her article.

From her two-hour interview with David Crowe, a Canadian researcher, with a degree in biology and mathematics, host of The Infectious Myth podcast, and President of the think-tank Rethinking Aids, Ms. Farber stated in her same article that David Crowe “broke down the problems with the PCR based Corona test in great detail, revealing a world of unimaginable complexity, as well as trickery.”

We might think that Tommy Morisson and the Dartmouth false alarm are isolated cases of a quick test hoax. But in his 2-hour interview with Ms. Farber, David Crowe made an intriguing reference to a Chinese study concluding that the PCR test produces false-positive results at the huge rate of 80% in an asymptomatic population.

David Crowe said: “There was a famous Chinese paper that estimated that if you’re testing asymptomatic people, up to 80% of positives could be false positive. That was kind of shocking, so shocking that PubMed had to withdraw the abstract even though the Chinese paper appears to still be published and available. I actually have a translation with a friend. I translated it into English and it’s a really, standard calculation of what they call positive predictive value. The abstract basically said that in asymptomatic populations, the chance of a positive coronavirus test being a true positive is only about 20%. 80% will be false positive.”

Ms. Farber also interviewed Dr. David Rasnick, a bio-chemist, protease developer, and former founder of an EM lab called Viral Forensics who said: “You don’t start with testing; you start with listening to the lungs. I’m skeptical that a PRC test is ever true. It’s a great scientific research tool.  It’s a horrible tool for clinical medicine.  30% of your infected cells have been killed before you show symptoms. By the time you show symptoms…the dead cells are generating the symptoms.”

Dr. Rasnick gave a piece of advice for people who want to be tested for Covid-19: “Don’t do it, I say when people ask me, No healthy person should be tested. It means nothing but it can destroy your life, make you absolutely miserable”

In their exchanges, Dave Rasnick concurs with David Crowe, saying: “To my knowledge, they have not yet purified this virus.” This comment has something to do with the absence of a “gold standard” in proving the existence of the Sars-Cov 2, which is its purification or separation from everything else and visualizing it. He further said: “PCR for diagnosis is a big problem. When you have to amplify it these huge numbers of time, it’s going to generate massive amounts of false positives. Again, I’m skeptical that a PCR test is ever true.”

Ms. Farber reported that Kary Mullis died last year at the age of 74, and could not be around to denounce the use of his invention as a diagnostic tool for the detection of a viral infection called covid-19 in the same way that he had shed tears in 1994 concerning the HIV. When asked by Ms. Farber about what the late Kary Mullis would say about this explosion of PCR insanity, Mr. Crowe said: “I’m sad that he isn’t here to defend his manufacturing technique”, “Kary did not invent a test. He invented a very powerful manufacturing technique that is being abused. What are the best applications for PCR? Not medical diagnostics. He knew that and he always said that.”

I venture to say that Karl Mullis must be turning and weeping in his grave knowing that his PCR invention has been turned into a monstrous instrument of deception to manufacture massive false tests in support of a Covid-19 pseudo-pandemic.