THE political landscape of Cagayan de Oro has taken a dramatic turn with the announcement of former mayor Oscar Moreno’s bid to return to City Hall. Having served two terms from 2013 to 2022, Moreno’s leadership left a lasting imprint on the city. His return raises questions about the future direction of local governance, the value of political continuity, and the risks of reverting to past practices.
Moreno’s tenure was marked by notable achievements. His administration prioritized infrastructure development, improved health and education services, and streamlined government processes.
Under his leadership, Cagayan de Oro earned recognition as a competitive and progressive city, drawing investments and spurring economic growth.
One of Moreno’s most lauded initiatives was the city’s response to disasters, particularly during Typhoon Sendong in 2011. His focus on resilience and recovery laid the foundation for a more disaster-prepared Cagayan de Oro.
Supporters argue that his return could bring back a proven leader with the vision and experience to tackle the city’s ongoing challenges.
With a firm grasp of governance and established relationships with national agencies, Moreno may have the tools to accelerate development initiatives that have stalled under the current administration.
However, not everyone views Moreno’s return as a step forward. Critics argue that his re-election bid reflects a lack of new leadership and fresh ideas in local politics.
After serving as governor of Misamis Oriental and mayor of Cagayan de Oro for over a decade, some believe it is time for new faces to take the helm.
Moreno’s past administration was not without controversy. Allegations of inefficiency, unfulfilled promises, and political conflicts marred his later years in office.
Opponents fear that his return could revive old grievances and stall progress, especially if it leads to divisive politics.
Also, his candidacy raises questions about the role of political dynasties and the recycling of leaders in Philippine politics.
Critics view his comeback bid as part of a larger trend where seasoned politicians cling to power instead of grooming successors or fostering new talent.
If Moreno secures a third term, he will face a city grappling with new and old challenges. Post-pandemic recovery, rising urbanization, and climate change require innovative solutions. The question is whether Moreno’s leadership style — rooted in traditional governance — can adapt to the evolving needs of a growing city.
Additionally, Moreno must address public concerns about transparency, inclusivity, and equitable development. For his return to be effective, he will need to show that his vision extends beyond his past accomplishments and genuinely reflects the aspirations of today’s Kagay-anons.
Ultimately, the decision lies with the people of Cagayan de Oro. Moreno’s comeback bid is a reminder that elections are an opportunity to assess not just candidates’ track records but also their potential to lead in the future.
Will Kagay-anons see Moreno as a leader who still has more to give, or will they choose to move forward with a fresh perspective?
As the midterm elections approach, voters must weigh the promise of experience against the demand for progress — and decide what kind of leadership will best serve their city.
In politics, as in life, comebacks can be triumphant or cautionary tales. Whether Moreno’s return will be a second wind or a step back remains to be seen.
