‘Fabrications’
Capt. Joe Patrick Martinez, Camp Evangelista spokesperson, sharply criticized Sanchez, and challenged him to show proof that Mayor Otaza had anything to do with the killings of people in his town, including Benjie Planos and Gabriel Alindao in last September 2013. Martinez said Planos and Alindao were killed after they left the NPA just like Otaza. He accused the NPA of being behind the murders, and then blaming these on Otaza. He said the NPA also fabricated stories about Otaza like the illegal detention of minors. But he said Otaza was known to have a soft heart for children while the NPA has long been training and using “child warriors.” “Most of the issues proliferated and fabricated by Sanchez came about after the NPA lost control of Loreto,” said Martinez, noting that Otaza was responsible for the surrender of 246 rebels. “The NPA took it against him.” Martinez also criticized Sanchez for his supposed attempt to justify murder even as it accused the NPA of being the “No. 1 violator of the human rights.” “Sanchez’s fabricated issues about Mayor Otaza don’t justify summary executions. No person is allowed to kill like that. It is wrong to kill,” Martinez said. Martinez said this even as the Human Rights Watch (HRW) sees the Oct. 19 killings as “just plain murder” and the rebel group’s “revolutionary justice” a violation of international humanitarian law. “The killing of the Otazas – like other NPA executions – is just plain murder,” reads a Mindanews report that quoted Phil Robertson, HRW’s deputy Asia director, as saying. “The NPA’s actions and claims of revolutionary justice handed down by people’s courts are flagrant violations of international law.” Robertson, in a statement dated and released Oct. 28, expressed fears that the NPA killings may worsen the human rights situation in Agusan del Sur and other Mindanao provinces where the military and its paramilitary forces have been implicated in extrajudicial killings and forced displacement, particularly against indigenous peoples. Mindanews also quoted Robertson as saying that by “resorting to vigilantism in the name of justice,” the NPA is “only serving to harm its own demands for justice for victims of military human rights violations.” Robertson said the “NPA should end this charade of unjust ‘people’s courts’ and cease all executions.” The HRW statement noted that throughout its four-decade insurgency, the NPA has “frequently executed people found ‘guilty’ by its so-called people’s courts, which do not meet basic fair trial standards.” The HRW said that as a party to an internal armed conflict, the NPA “is obligated to abide by international humanitarian law, including common article 3 to the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and its Second Additional Protocol of 1977 (Protocol II), to which the Philippines is party.” It said International Humanitarian Law “prohibits killing civilians, mistreating anyone in custody, and convicting anyone in proceedings that do not meet international fair trial standards.” It noted that Article 6 of Protocol II specifies that criminal courts must be independent and impartial, and the accused shall have “all necessary rights and means of defense,” among other guarantees, and that those tried by people’s courts are “typically convicted in absentia, thus denied the right to be tried in one’s presence before an impartial court.” The HRW statement added that claims by the NPA that defendants receive a fair hearing during its people’s court proceedings “are not supported by the facts.” It said Philip Alston, the former United Nations special rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary, or arbitrary executions who investigated extrajudicial killings in the Philippines in 2007, described the “people’s courts” as “either deeply flawed or simply a sham.”



