Dubious mass testing

By Jude Josue L. Sabio .

The PCR test for Covid-19 is itself a hoax, just like the Covid-19 that it supposedly tests.

The American doctor Andrew Kauffman analysed the first tests in Wuhan, observing that the test undertaken there, the PCR test, identifies only the RNA, and not the virus itself. The basic flaw of this test is that the genetic material RNA is found in other particles, not just in a virus.

In the early tests in Wuhan, the RNA found and sequenced was said to have come from the coronavirus, even if the “gold standard” of “purifying and visualizing” the virus was not done.

According to Dr. Kauffman, what was said to be the covid-19 in the early test in Wuhan is just the exosome, an enzyme in the body that fights toxin coming from an infection, injury or insult to the body.

Dr. Kaufman quoted from an expert Dr. James Hildreth, M.D., the President and Chief Executive Officer of Meharry Medical College who said in his professional article that “. . . the virus is fully an exosome in every sense of the word.” Dr. Kaufman described the so-called Covid 19 as “indistinguishable” from an exosome.

Leading voices in the medical field have since come out contradicting the WHO and its Director Tedros Adhanom Gebreyesus.

For his part, Dr. Wittkowsky has asserted that there is nothing fundamentally different from the seasonal flu that we know of, meaning that what is being said to be covid-19 is just the influenza.

The controversial Dr. Fauci has pronounced, in his professional article, that the clinical consequences of the Covid-19 may be akin to that of the influenza. In a rebuke against the WHO, Dr. Fauci contradicted Gebreyesus’ WHO when he said that such clinical consequence is akin to influenza’s only 0.1 %, not 3.4 % as claimed by the WHO.

Dr. Dan Erickson debunked the draconian lockdown as bereft of science, observing that covid-19 is similar to and not even deadlier than the flu, based on a comparison of statistics of the covid-19 and the influenza in the New York and California as well as in Spain.

A republican candidate for senator in the state of New York, Dr. Shiva is also very vocal in his stinging criticism against what is said to be the coronavirus.

Dr. Kauffman’s analysis is recently being shared by Dr. Mohammad Iqbal Adil who is a Consultant Surgeon of the National Health Services of the United Kingdom, who went as far as to say that the covid-19 is a hoax, and that, to date, no researcher has validated the existence of the supposed coronavirus.

This analysis of Dr. Kauffman is a breakthrough for the truth behind this covid-19 hoax. His stinging rebuke is a vicious, valid attack on the legitimacy of the initial tests in Wuhan where the supposed coronavirus is reported to have originated.

In the ultimate sense, his analysis is a frontal, direct attack on WHO Director Tedros Adhanom Gebreyesus’ reckless, irresponsible announcement of a pandemic for being based on those faulty tests in Wuhan.

In light of this serious challenge coming from reputable doctors, the authority of Mr. Gebreyesus, who by the way is not even a medical doctor, is shattered into pieces. As the supposed guardian of global public health, he is expected to address this mounting challenge to his authority, even if he is not a medical doctor.

At the very least, in order to prevent further erosion of global confidence at a time when the USA through President Trump has vehemently attacked the WHO, Mr. Gebreyesus should demonstrate, in a very transparent manner for the satisfaction of the whole world, that the coronavirus really exists.

But Mr. Gebreyesus and the whole WHO have so far failed, nay refused, to refute Dr. Kauffman and other personalities.

These credible attacks present a very real dilemma. Considering that the very existence of the supposed coronavirus is being debunked, it appears then that the disease called covid-19 also does not exist.

Under the germ theory of disease, a disease cannot arise unless there is a germ or a virus that is supposed to cause it. And since there is no disease after all, there is, thus, no point in making a test for a non-existent disease called covid-19.

Dr. Kauffman debunked the PCR test as unreliable, for being a test not to determine the virus itself, but rather to determine only the genetic material RNA which can be present in other particles including the exosome. According to him, the PCR test is 80% erroneous, resulting into a finding of “false positive”.

Since exosomes are present in the body when a person has an infection or injury, the PCR test can turn out to be “false positive” due to exosomes in the body cells. These tests could bloat the number of persons said to be infected with the supposed coronavirus.

Early in the WHO-declared pandemic, the Czech Republic received testing materials from China. But the Czech authorities came out in public declaring that the testing materials were 80% erroneous.

Although the Chinese authorities denied the claim of the Czech authorities, the Czech claim is consistent with what Dr. Kauffman has stated that the PCR test is 80% “false positive”. And considering the faulty, misleading initial tests in Wuhan, the Chinese denial does not inspire confidence.

Kary B. Mullis, who is the Inventor of the PCR test, debunked his very own invention when he said: “… these (PCR) tests cannot detect free, infectious viruses at all.”

He is joined by Dr. David Rasnick, bio-chemist and protease developer, who is quoted as saying: “I’m sceptical that a PCR test is ever true”.

A Canadian Researcher David Crowe also confirmed a PCR test to be 80% erroneous, thus: “… if you’re (PCR) testing asymptomatic people, up to 80% of positives could be false positive.”

In the face of this mounting criticism and doubt, mass testing for this supposed covid-19 will end up to be futile and impractical. Since the virus is non-existent and only the exosome exists, there is no point in subjecting a person to a PCR test that cannot even test a virus, but rather only a genetic material called RNA.

Since the PCR test is, after all, 80% “false positive,” there is no medical reason to use such a test. A person with some other injury or infection like influenza or acute respiratory illness or other illness like lung cancer can have a lot of exosomes as part of his immune system and can thus turn out to be “false positive.”

The publicly declared reason for the mass testing is that a scientific determination can be made about exactly how many have been infected. This objective cannot be ever achieved when the testing materials are 80% “false positive” just like what happened in the Czech Republic.

Instead of giving the government a reliable data for decision-making, the mass testing could only mislead the government into making unsound judgment based on an 80% “false positive” testing. In turn, the people will be subjected to a lot of fear and public stigma.

The WHO and Mr. Gebreyesus have not responded to credible challenges against the reliability of the PCR test, in the same manner that they have failed to demonstrate the existence of the supposed coronavirus.

Their continuing silence and neglect is dangerous, because it lends to the wrong impression that the WHO is implicitly sanctioning this misleading PCR test and is acquiescing to the faulty initial tests in Wuhan.

“My opinion is that this pandemic is completely manufactured public relations marketing operation and actually there is no virus, no disease, but there are major changes in government that limit freedoms…,” Dr. Kauffman is quoted as saying in an interview.

To my mind, what Dr. Kauffman said mirrors the realities in the Philippines that resorted to the draconian lockdown, even if “actually there is no virus, no disease.”

Unless and until the WHO and Mr. Gebreyesus properly respond to this serious challenge, their declaration of a pandemic amounts to no more than a hoax of global proportions, because it is based on the hoax of the Covid-19 that is, in turn, based on the hoax of the Wuhan PCR test.

It is dubious to use the PCR test for mass testing when it has even failed in Wuhan to really determine the existence of the coronavirus.

(Jude Josue Sabio is a lawyer from Misamis Oriental. The views he expressed in this column do not necessarily reflect the stand of this paper or any of its staff members.)