Pseudo-pandemic of testing

By Jude Josue L. Sabio .

THE “criminal medical organization” WHO, in the words of high-profile Bulgarian pathologist Dr. Stoian Alexov, is basing its Covid 19 pseudo-pandemic not only on a non-existent virus but also on the RT PCR test that results in a delusion of 80% false positive.

“The Coronavirus scare that emanated from Wuhan, China in December of 2019 is an epidemic of testing,” declared David Crowe in his “Op-Ed: Does the 2019 Coronavirus Exist?” on 14 March 2020 originally published on www.theinfectiousmyth.com.

A Canadian researcher, with a degree in biology and mathematics, host of The Infectious Myth podcast, and president of the think-tank Rethinking Aids, David Crowe based its theory of an “epidemic of testing” on the fact that: “There is no proof that a virus is being detected by the test and there is absolutely no concern about whether there are a significant number of false positives on the test.”

He further anchors his assertion of an “epidemic of testing” on the fact that the existence of the coronavirus has not been rigorously demonstrated, saying: “What I learned from studying Sars, the previous big coronavirus scare, after the 2003 epidemic, was that nobody had proved a coronavirus existed, let alone was pathogenic.”

To underscore his point, he contends that “(I)f the virus exists, then it should be possible to purify viral particles. From these particles RNA can be extracted and should match the RNA used in this test. Until this is done it is possible that the RNA comes from another source, which could be the cells of the patient, bacteria, fungi etc.”

By mentioning the need to “purify,” David Crowe is referring to the “gold standard” in proving the existence of what is believed to be the Sars-Cov 2.
Purification is “the separation of an object from everything else that is not that object.” This was done by Nobel laureate Marie Curie when she purified 100 mg of radium chloride in 1898 from tons of pitchblende. Purification is an essential pre-requisite in fulfilling the Koch postulates, a set of scientific principles required to definitively and scientifically prove the existence of a particular microorganism and its exclusive cause of a particular illness.

In an article entitled “Scientists Have Utterly Failed to Prove that the Coronavirus Fulfills Koch’s Postulates” recently published in Off-Guardian, Amory Devereux and Rosemary Frei reported that they have “scoured the internet and found no proof that scientists have done the simple steps required to demonstrate that Sars-Cov-2 conclusively meets even one – never mind all —“ of Koch’s postulates. After an analysis of available relevant literature, they concluded that “(F)rom all the available information, the novel coronavirus doesn’t appear to meet any of these tenets, never mind all….”

David Crowe cites a Chinese article published in the New England Journal on 14 January 2020. In the article “A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019,” the 12 Chinese scientists claimed that their “analyses provide evidence implicating 2019-Ncov in the Wuhan outbreak.” But they were quick to expressly admit that their “study does not fulfill Koch’s postulates.” It is worthy to note that the results of their study were shared with WHO for purposes of mass testing.

Mr. Crowe cites another Chinese article entitled “Clinical Features of Patients Infected with 2019 Novel Coronavirus in Wuhan, China” published in the Lancet in January 2020, in which the authors admitted that “we did not perform tests for detecting infectious virus in blood.”

In their article “Covid-19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless” published in Off-Guardian on 27 June 2020, Torsten Engelbrecht and Konstantin Demeter reported that they asked the science teams, (who authored four papers purporting to show the existence of the novel coronavirus), for “proof of whether the electron-microscopic shots depicted in their vitro experiments show purified viruses.” Not a single team said “yes.” Both authors just got answers like “No, we did not obtain electron micrograph showing the degree of purification.” “And yet,” both authors noted, “nobody said that purification was not a necessary step.”

Mr. Engelbrecht and Mr. Demeter reported having contacted Dr. Charles Calisher, who is a seasoned virologist, whom they asked whether he knows one single paper in which Sars-Cov-2 has been isolated and finally really purified, and Dr. Calisher answered: “I know of no such a publication. I have kept an eye out for one.”

As stated by both authors, in 2001 Science published an “impassioned plea… to the younger generation” from several veteran virologists, among them Calisher, saying that: “[modern virus detection methods like] sleek polymerase chain reaction […] tell little or nothing about how a virus multiplies, which animals carry it, [or] how it makes people sick. [It is] like trying to say whether somebody has bad breath by looking at his fingerprint.”

Borrowing from the words of Englebrecht and Demeter, all these actually mean “that one cannot conclude that the RNA gene sequences, which the scientists took from the tissue samples prepared in the mentioned in vitro trials and for which the PCR tests are finally being “calibrated,” belong to a specific virus — in this case Sars-Cov-2.”

Stated otherwise, there is no solid gold standard or scientific proof that the Sars-Cov 2 in fact exists. As a result, it cannot be scientifically concluded that the RT PCR test being used in mass testing could definitively prove a viral infection called Covid 19.

The paramount scientific need for “purification” is highlighted by the US Dartmouth hospital incident of pseudo-epidemic in 2007 which I cited in my article in this paper entitled “A Pseudo-Pandemic Device.” In that episode, a quick PCR test was undertaken in the Dartmouth hospital among its health workers who were believed to be having a “whooping cough.” The PCR test showed a positive result for a “whooping cough.” But when a definitive test later was undertaken to grow the bacterium bordetella pertussis in the lab, it turned out that there was no bacterium in existence. It was just a case of false alarm, it being a respiratory illness associated with the common cold. That definitive test is the purification of the bacterium that is the gold standard for its existence.

Based on what David Crowe said, purification definitively identifies the virus itself, from which its “RNA can be extracted and should match the RNA used in this test (RT PCR).” In other words, before the RT PCR test is undertaken, the virus should first be purified and its RNA identified. It is only then that the RNA detected in the RT PCR test can be definitively linked to the RNA of the virus. Otherwise, it is possible that the RNA detected in the RT PCR test belongs to other particles which could be non-viral.

David Crowe cites that a “similar situation was revealed in March 1997 concerning HIV, when two papers published in the same issue of the journal “Virology” revealed that the vast majority of what had previously been called “pure HIV” was impurities that were clearly not HIV, and the mixture also included microvesicles that look very similar to HIV under an electron microscope, but are of cellular origin.”

This recalls to mind what American Dr. Andrew Kauffman has claimed that purification and visualization of the virus was not done in relation to the early pneumonia patients in Wuhan, and as a result what was found was exosome instead, which is exactly similar, in terms of appearance and size, to what was just assumed to be a novel coronavirus found in the lung extracts.

The imperative scientific need to purify the purported virus is even more justified by the recent autopsies revealed by Bulgarian pathologist Dr. Stoian Alexov showing that no one had died of the coronavirus in European countries. Unless shown to be false, these autopsies enjoy a presumption of valid proof that the novel coronavirus does not exist at all.

As the Bulgarian Dr. Katsarov who interviewed Dr. Alexov aptly said, pathologists conducting autopsies are like the supreme court because they render a final decision. It is worthy of note to state here that an autopsy in 2013 of Tommy Morisson, the American heavyweight boxing champ, definitively proved the non-existence of the HIV, contrary to a false HIV test on him in 1996 that destroyed his boxing career.

A Chinese paper was cited by David Crowe in his interview with Celia Farber, which I cited in my mentioned article, and the abstract of said paper was posted by him at the end of his op-ed. The article written in Chinese is entitled “Potential False-Positive Rate Among the ‘Asymptomatic Infected Individuals’ in Close Contacts of Covid-19 Patients” and was published in PubMed. Its published abstract states, inter alia, that “the false-positive rate of positive results was 80.33%,” concluding that “In the close contacts of Covid-19 patients, nearly half or even more of the ‘asymptomatic infected individuals’ reported in the active nucleic acid test screening might be false positives.”

In his Op-Ed, David Crowe concludes: “The coronavirus panic is just that, an irrational panic, based on an unproven RNA test, that has never been connected to a virus. And which won’t be connected to a virus unless the virus is purified.”

(Jude Josue Sabio is a lawyer from Misamis Oriental.)