Non-killer virus

By Jude Josue L. Sabio .

COVID-19 is not a killer virus, as aptly said by the German physician Dr. Heiko Schoning who has recently gained fame for being the principal figure of the Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee in Germany.

In its published report cited in my previous article, the Physicians for Informed Consent stated that “(A)lthough more than 99% of people infected with Sars-Cov-2 fully recover, some cases involve severe complications and could be fatal.” This assertion clearly implies that only a negligible number of 1% succumbs to death.

Per the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, as cited in the article of the Physicians for Informed Consent, “(M)ost people have mild illness and can recover at home without medical care.”

In his recent Facebook post, Robert Kennedy, Jr., a lawyer and son of the famous US Attorney Robert F. Kennedy, revealed the relevant data from the CDC that, indeed, more than 99% of those claimed to be infected do survive.

True to his long-standing stature as a medical activist, lawyer Robert Kennedy, Jr. has been famously in the forefront against this Covid-19 mass psychosis.

All over the world, especially in the northern and southern hemispheres, people are exposed on an annual basis to the influenza. In fact, people worldwide are exposed to other “influenza-like illnesses” including respiratory syncytial virus, human metapneumovirus, common colds, whooping cough, tuberculosis, and myriad other respiratory illnesses, and now this Covid-19 disease.

But, except for the 2009 swine flu pandemic which gave rise to the 1st-ever WHO pandemic declaration, there was never any instance in historical accounts that WHO declared a pandemic in all the previous influenza-like illness pandemics including the seasonal flu.

And yet, the so-called 2009 H1N1 swine flu pandemic is not even a genuine pandemic. In the face of the first organizational attack mounted by the Council of Europe led by German physician and parliamentarian Wolfgang Wodarg, the WHO itself admitted that it had already known the H1N1 flu strain to be not severe and not deadly even before its pandemic declaration in 2009.

Still, the WHO declared a pandemic principally on the basis of the spread of the H1N1 influenza strain, because the WHO took away the standard of “severity” shortly before its pandemic declaration.

But, according to Wodarg, the spread is immaterial, given that influenza is innately characterized by its fast spread.

During the existence of the WHO, it did not declare any pandemic prior to the 2009 H1N1 swine flu pandemic, presumably because the standard of “severity” existed as a permanent block against such declaration.

The standard of “severity” meant then that even if the influenza spreads fast, such spread alone is not enough to warrant a pandemic declaration; it has to be severe.

The only time that the WHO was able to declare a worldwide pandemic was in the 2009 H1N1 swine flu pandemic.

The WHO was enabled to make such declaration after it unilaterally discarded the standard of “severity” a short time prior to its pandemic declaration.

This anomalous action of the WHO to suddenly discard the standard of “severity” provoked the attack by Wodarg who argued that “severity” was taken out as a last-minute change to enable the WHO to declare the pandemic, even if it had known beforehand that the H1N1 influenza strain was not severe.

In a similar fashion, the WHO was enabled to declare the Covid pandemic, even if it is to be conceded that at the time of the pandemic declaration this covid-19 is not severe. But even without the standard of “severity” in place, the WHO still claimed, early into the pandemic, a 3.4% fatality rate, which was supported by the Imperial College London.

In its article, the Physicians for Informed Consent reported that “(O)n March 3, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) wrote that globally “about 3.4% of reported Covid-19 cases have died”, and that “(O)n March 16, a report from Imperial College London stated, “the public health threat [that Covid-19] represents is the most serious seen in a respiratory virus since the 1918 H1N1 influenza pandemic.”

Obviously, this is part of the mainstream narrative to project the covid-19 as deadly and severe, even if the standard of “severity” is no longer in place. The WHO, in conjunction with the Imperial College London, appears to contend that even if “severity” is no longer required, still the Covid-19 is severe enough to warrant a pandemic declaration.

But the WHO’s 3.4% was attacked early on by the German doctor and renowned scientist Sucharit Bhakdi for being baseless just causing “horror” but “meaningless.” As early as late March, the American top doctor Anthony Fauci and colleagues, in a New England Journal of Medicine article, already claimed that the “overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza (which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1%) or a pandemic influenza (similar to those in 1957 and 1968).”

In its same article, the Physicians for Informed Consent contradicted the WHO, saying that based on current data, “the infection/fatality rate of Covid-19 is 0.26%.” which is a far cry from WHO’s 3.4%.

According to Bulgarian pathologist Dr. Alexov, autopsies conducted in Europe revealed that the purported coronavirus deaths did not arise only and solely from Covid-19, while influenza has been shown to have by itself alone killed a person.

Dr. Knut Wittkowsky, Dr. Dan Erickson and host of other doctors observed covid-19 to be no different from the seasonal flu in terms of spread and fatality rate.

Overall, this Covid-19 has been revealed to be same as the 2009 H1N1 swine flu pandemic which was not as severe or as deadly as it was thought to be, prompting Wodarg to categorically denounce the 2009 H1N1 swine flu pandemic as a “fake pandemic”, which by extension applies also to this Covid-19 pandemic.

It can now be stated with confidence that this Sars Cov-2 is not a killer virus. It is not more deadly and more severe than the influenza. It can be said to be only as dangerous as the influenza. It is even less deadly and less severe than the seasonal or pandemic influenza.

In almost all influenza seasons or pandemic situations, the WHO never declared a pandemic, because the influenza is known to be not severe or not deadly, despite its innate spread in hardly hit areas in the northern and southern hemispheres.

Since this influenza-like Covid-19 is no more dangerous than or is only as dangerous as the seasonal or pandemic influenza, it is therefore also possible that this Covid-19 can be left to spread without the necessity of any pandemic declaration.

In fact, the demonstrated lack of “severity” or “deadliness” of this Covid-19 disease renders the pandemic declaration to be devoid of any foundation.

To be sure, a pandemic declaration is not justified when the purported pandemic disease is not “severe” or not “deadly”.
In turn, the egregious draconian lockdown is anchored on the same underlying reason for this pandemic declaration.

Lockdown is resorted to, because the covid-19 is thought to be “severe” or “deadly.”

However, since Covid-19 has been shown to be not “severe” and not “deadly,” the egregious lockdown is rendered to be similarly devoid of a rational foundation.

The innate spread of an “influenza-like illness” including Covid-19 is not a valid ground for a lockdown, as evidenced by the fact that lockdown was never resorted to for almost all cases of seasonal or pandemic influenza which spreads fast.

Intriguingly, this is the unstated underlying reason for the recent turnaround of the WHO. In no uncertain terms, a certain Dr. Nabarro of the WHO decried the lockdown, specifically attacking such lockdown in Spain and Australia, and calling for its immediate lifting.

Contradicting the long-standing WHO policy, Dr. Nabarro, in a stunning revelation, rebuffed the lockdown as an unsound public action to combat the pandemic, stating that it is not the recommended policy of the WHO.

Dr. Nabarro denounced the lockdown as increasing only the immense poverty worldwide, calling for other governmental actions that are less destructive to society.

Dr. Nabarro did not state it expressly, understandably because making a contradictory admission is gravely detrimental to the integrity and credibility of the WHO.

But his message arguably implied, though, that the lockdown is not justified by the fact that this covid-19 is not “severe” and not “deadly”. He is implying further that no lockdown is necessary for Covid-19 because no lockdown was necessary for the influenza.

But one thing can be sure: in a slap to the face of WHO Director General Gebreyesus and government leaders worldwide, Dr. Nabarro’s announcement means that, as a matter of fact, the lockdown system in any part of the world, since its inception and all this time, can only be considered to be a monumental, catastrophic and horrible mistake.

(Jude Josue Sabio is a lawyer from Misamis Oriental.)